Introduction: Why Choosing the Right PhD Advisor Matters

In this episode of Talking Papers, we take a break from our usual deep dives to focus on a challenge every PhD student faces: finding the right advisor. The relationship with your advisor plays a crucial role in shaping your academic and professional path. Our guest, Derek Liu, returns to share his insights from his own academic journey. This episode also marks the start of our new PhD guide series, where we’ll address key topics every PhD student will encounter, from choosing an advisor to navigating the ups and downs of academia. Tune in (or keep reading) for valuable advice to help guide you through the PhD process.

Why This Discussion Matters

Many prospective PhD students don’t ask the right questions when choosing an advisor. They may feel grateful just to be accepted into a program, without considering the dynamics of the advisor-student relationship. But the reality is that a PhD is a long-term commitment, and the advisor holds significant influence over the student’s progress, opportunities, and overall well-being.

In this episode, we discuss the key factors to consider when selecting a PhD advisor, drawing from our own experiences and lessons learned.

Note: During the creation of this episode, we debated whether to use “advisor” or “supervisor,” as both terms often refer to the same role in a PhD journey. After careful thought, we chose “advisor” because it better captures the guiding, supportive role of the position. “Advisor” reflects a collaborative relationship focused on the student’s academic and professional growth, unlike “supervisor,” which suggests a top-down approach.

Things to consider when choosing an advisor

Here’s a quick overview of the key points we’ll cover in this episode and blog post to help guide your decision-making process when choosing a PhD advisor:

• Pre-Tenure vs. Post-Tenure Advisors: Understanding the differences and what they mean for your experience.
• Group Size: The impact of working in a small versus a large research group.
• The Lab: What to look for in a research environment.
• Money: Considering funding, grants, and financial support.
• Personality Match: Why a good personal fit is essential for a productive relationship.
• Research Topic: How to align your interests with the advisor’s focus.
• Communication: The importance of clear and effective communication throughout your PhD journey.

By the end of this post, you’ll have a clearer picture of how to make the right choice for your academic and professional future.

Pre-Tenure vs. Post-Tenure Advisors: What You Need to Know

One of the often-overlooked aspects of choosing a PhD advisor is understanding where they stand in their career—specifically, whether they are pre-tenure or post-tenure. This distinction can have a significant impact on your PhD experience.

Pre-Tenure Advisors: The Drive to Prove Themselves

A pre-tenure advisor is typically in the early stages of their faculty career, working hard to establish themselves in their field. Their focus is often split between producing high-impact research, securing grants, publishing in top-tier venues, and building their lab’s reputation. While this energy can be exciting, it also means that pre-tenure advisors may have high expectations and place significant pressure on their students.

For PhD students, this can be both a blessing and a challenge. On the positive side, a pre-tenure advisor is often highly motivated, deeply involved in research, and eager to publish. They are likely to be hands-on and actively engaged in projects. However, they may also have limited time, be under stress, and have less institutional power, which could impact their ability to advocate for students in funding or career advancement situations.

Post-Tenure Advisors: Stability and Influence

A post-tenure advisor has already passed the tenure hurdle, which provides them with greater job security and more academic freedom. This can mean a more stable and well-funded lab, better connections, and a broader professional network. Post-tenure advisors often have the ability to provide long-term mentorship and career guidance, leveraging their established reputation to open doors for their students.

Not all post-tenure advisors are equally engaged. Some stay active in research, pushing the boundaries of their field, while others shift to administrative roles, reducing their involvement in day-to-day research. PhD students must assess whether a post-tenure advisor remains engaged in research or has transitioned to other responsibilities. A practical way to gauge this is by checking their Google Scholar profile. Look for an upward trend in citations, which often indicates ongoing research activity and influence in their field.

Which Is Right for You?

There is no single “best” option—it depends on what kind of mentorship you thrive under. If you prefer high-energy, fast-paced environments and are willing to navigate the challenges of working with an advisor striving for tenure, a pre-tenure advisor might be a great fit. On the other hand, if you value stability, long-term connections, and an advisor with institutional influence, a post-tenure mentor could be a better choice.

Ultimately, the key is to assess not just the advisor’s tenure status, but also their mentoring style, research involvement, and how they support their students’ growth. In the next section, we’ll break down other critical factors to consider when making this important decision.

Does (Group) Size Matter?

One of the key factors that can shape your PhD experience is the size of the research group you join. Group size significantly influences supervision style, collaboration opportunities, and the overall research environment. Understanding the trade-offs between large and small groups can help you make an informed decision that aligns with your working style and career goals.

Large Research Groups: Structure and Resources

In large research labs, which can range from 20 to over 40 members, a hierarchical structure is often necessary due to time constraints on the principal investigator (PI). In such settings, the PI typically advises postdocs, who in turn mentor PhD students. This structure can be beneficial for students who thrive in a collaborative, corporate-like environment where multiple layers of mentorship exist.

A significant advantage of large labs is access to abundant resources. These include computing power, funding, and a broad network of collaborators, both within and outside the lab. If you enter a PhD with substantial research experience—perhaps having completed a master’s degree or already having publications—you might find that the high-level guidance from an advisor, coupled with the vast resources of a large lab, is sufficient for your needs.

Moreover, in larger groups, there is often less micromanagement, allowing for greater independence in research. This can be ideal for students who are self-directed and comfortable seeking advice from peers rather than relying solely on their advisor. Additionally, the opportunity to interact with numerous postdocs and fellow students can provide valuable learning experiences and networking opportunities.

Small Research Groups: Personalized Mentorship and Close-Knit Collaboration

Smaller research groups, typically with fewer than ten members, offer a more intimate academic environment. In these groups, the PI can dedicate more time to individual students, often holding regular one-on-one meetings to discuss research progress and personal development.

The benefits of smaller groups include stronger relationships with the advisor and peers, fostering a sense of community. In these settings, discussions often extend beyond research, covering career advice and personal growth. Additionally, students in small labs may have more opportunities to collaborate closely on similar but distinct research problems, leading to a richer intellectual exchange.

However, small groups can also have drawbacks. If the group is too small, you might find yourself lacking immediate peer collaborators, which can sometimes be isolating. In such cases, forming external collaborations becomes crucial to maintaining a dynamic research experience.

Small or Large? Picking the Right Research Group for You

Ultimately, the ideal research group size depends on your working style and professional aspirations. If you prefer a structured environment with extensive resources and a broad network, a large group might be the right choice. On the other hand, if you value direct mentorship and close-knit collaborations, a smaller group may better suit your needs.

Regardless of size, what truly matters is the overall research environment, including the people, infrastructure, funding, and collaborative opportunities available. The best approach is to assess what you’re looking for in a PhD experience and find a research group that aligns with your academic and personal goals.

The Lab

When selecting a PhD advisor, it’s important to consider the lab’s diversity, both in people and research topics. A diverse lab brings together experts working on different aspects of the field, creating an environment where you can seek help on various topics. This is crucial if your research interests evolve. A mix of perspectives can spark new ideas and offer collaboration opportunities, helping you grow as a researcher.

Lab Atmosphere and Culture

The atmosphere within the lab plays a critical role in your overall experience during your PhD. A lab with a positive, supportive, and non-competitive culture is essential. You’re going to spend years working in this environment, so it’s important to feel comfortable and happy. A stress-free environment where lab members collaborate rather than compete promotes better mental well-being and allows you to focus on your research. The relationship between lab members and the advisor should foster a sense of camaraderie and mutual respect, making the lab a place where everyone can thrive.

Relationships and Networking

The people you interact with in the lab can have a long-lasting impact on your career. Building strong relationships with lab members is vital, as they may eventually become collaborators, mentors, or even business partners. Having good relationships with your lab mates can also lead to lasting friendships that extend beyond academia. As your peers move on to different roles, they may become valuable members of your professional network, opening doors to future opportunities in both academic and industry settings.

Infrastructure and Resources

Access to strong infrastructure and resources is crucial for successful PhD research, especially in fields like AI and computer graphics that require significant computational power. Having access to robust GPUs or computing clusters is often essential for tackling large-scale problems. A lab without these resources can slow progress and make it difficult to publish your work.

If you’re in a lab still building its infrastructure, evaluate whether there’s a clear growth plan and if you can contribute to developing these resources. Being part of this process can offer valuable technical learning and a greater sense of ownership.

In addition to computational resources, support staff, like IT professionals or lab engineers, can greatly affect your experience. Labs with dedicated support teams help students focus on research rather than technical issues, such as hardware, software, or infrastructure maintenance.

Ultimately, the lab’s infrastructure and support should align with your research goals. A well-resourced lab with strong support can enhance your research, while a lack of resources can hinder success. Consider these factors carefully when choosing a lab.

The Importance of Collaborations in a Research Lab

When it comes to selecting a research lab, one of the critical factors to consider is the lab’s collaborations, both with industry and internationally. These collaborations can have a profound impact on your research, network, and career trajectory.

Industry Collaborations

Industry connections are valuable for researchers, especially those aiming to bridge academia and real-world applications. These collaborations can lead to internships, where students gain hands-on experience solving problems faced by companies—often different from theoretical issues in academic papers. They offer insight into practical challenges and expose students to real-world problems, allowing them to work with cutting-edge technology and data.

Moreover, industry collaborations often come with additional benefits such as access to resources like GPUs, cloud credits, and even direct funding for research projects. Some labs even secure specific funding for student-driven projects through industry partnerships. This can be a great way to gain practical experience while also securing financial support for your research.

However, there is a trade-off: while industry partnerships offer valuable resources, they may also come with less flexibility in terms of research topics. Research is often more directed, and the scope of academic freedom can be limited. If you’re someone who prefers to explore independent research avenues, this might be a consideration.

International Collaborations

International collaborations are equally, if not more, important in expanding your research horizon. Working with prominent international researchers can significantly enhance your career. These collaborations not only improve the quality of your research by bringing in diverse perspectives but also help you build a global network that can be invaluable in the future. Whether it’s through co-authored papers or cross-border research projects, these connections can open doors to postdoctoral opportunities and future collaborations.

A strong indicator of a lab’s international reach is the presence of co-authors from various parts of the world in recent publications. Checking a prospective advisor’s recent papers and the profiles of their collaborators can give you a clear picture of the lab’s global connections. If you see a variety of international researchers listed, it’s a good sign that the lab is well-connected and collaborative.

Moreover, international collaborations can also facilitate access to additional resources and funding from global partners, which further supports your research endeavors.

When choosing a lab, evaluating its industry and international collaborations is crucial. These partnerships not only enhance the research experience but also contribute to your personal and professional growth. Industry ties provide practical experience and resources, while international collaborations broaden your research opportunities and career prospects.

Money, Money, Money

When choosing a PhD advisor, one critical factor to consider is the funding available to support your research. The type of funding can greatly impact the flexibility you have in your research direction. There are two main types of funding: unrestricted and restricted.

Unrestricted Funding: More Flexibility

Unrestricted funding allows you to pursue your research interests freely, without external constraints. This type of funding gives the lab the flexibility to explore various topics, allowing you to choose the area that most excites you.

Restricted Funding: Potential Limitations

On the other hand, restricted funding comes with certain expectations, often tied to specific industry collaborations or other external factors. While this funding can sometimes align with your interests, it may also limit your research choices, steering you toward specific areas due to the nature of the funding. If this is the case, it’s essential to evaluate whether you’re truly interested in those research directions or if they might be a potential red flag.

Different Ways Money Is Spent in a PhD Program

Funding isn’t just about the salary or stipend you receive—it can be spent in various ways that significantly impact your PhD experience. Understanding how your advisor allocates their funds can help you gauge their priorities and the opportunities available to you.

Stipends and Salaries

The first and most direct form of funding is the scholarship or stipend that you receive. This is typically a regular payment that supports your living expenses while you’re working on your PhD. It’s important to ensure that the stipend is sufficient for your needs, especially if you have additional responsibilities, like supporting a family.

Conference and Networking Opportunities

Attending conferences is crucial for professional development and networking. Your advisor’s funding can determine how much support they provide. If funds are limited, you may need to secure conference funding yourself, which could hinder your career. However, an advisor with adequate funding will likely support you in attending conferences and summer schools, boosting your visibility and connections.

Equipment and Research Resources

Another key consideration is the availability of funds for essential research tools and equipment. Whether it’s high-performance computing hardware, lab-specific equipment like scanners and cameras, or other research needs, these are crucial for completing your work. Advisors with sufficient funding will be better positioned to provide the necessary resources for your research.

The Role of Grants and Fellowships

Grants play a central role in funding PhD research, and your advisor’s ability to secure them can significantly affect your experience.

Types of Grants

Grants come from various sources, such as government agencies or prestigious research programs like the NSF (US) or European Union’s Horizon (EU) grants. These grants can be substantial and are often highly competitive. Advisors with a proven track record of securing such grants signal that they have the resources to support your research.

Why Grants Matter

Grants are not only vital for providing research funds, but they are also a mark of an advisor’s reputation and success. Advisors who secure competitive grants demonstrate their ability to attract resources, which can positively influence your PhD journey. Additionally, being involved in grant writing can be a valuable experience, though it shouldn’t overshadow your primary focus on research.

The Snowball Effect of Successful Grants

A successful grant application can lead to further opportunities. If an advisor has received one grant, they are more likely to secure additional grants, as they can demonstrate their past success. This creates a “snowball effect,” where the accumulation of grants increases the advisor’s ability to attract further funding, which can directly benefit you as a PhD student.

Considering the Funding Culture at Different Stages of Your Advisor’s Career

The stage of your advisor’s career plays a role in how funding is secured and allocated.

Pre-Tenure Advisors: Focus on Grant Writing

Early-career advisors, especially those pre-tenure, often spend a significant portion of their time applying for grants. This is essential for their career development, but it also means they may be more focused on securing funding than on providing financial support for their students. It’s important to understand how this dynamic might impact you during your PhD.

Post-Tenure Advisors: Stable Funding and More Opportunities

Once an advisor has tenure, their funding situation tends to stabilize. They will likely have a more established history of successful grants and a better ability to allocate resources for research, conferences, and equipment. If you’re working with a post-tenure advisor, you should expect to see a variety of grants listed on their CV, indicating their ability to secure resources for their research projects. If you don’t see that, it is a red flag!

Financial Stress and Its Impact on Your PhD Experience

Funding isn’t just a practical concern—it can also affect your well-being. The financial pressures of a PhD can be stressful, especially if there are gaps in funding or if you’re left to find resources independently. It’s important to assess not only how much money your advisor can provide but also how the financial situation might affect your mental and emotional health.

Balancing Research and Financial Stress

While your primary focus should be research, financial stress can interfere with your ability to concentrate and produce quality work. If you find yourself constantly worried about how to fund conferences, buy equipment, or even cover basic living expenses, it could distract you from your research and ultimately hinder your progress. Therefore, ensuring that your advisor has adequate funding to support your academic and personal needs is essential for a successful PhD experience.

Money Matters in Your PhD Journey

The money available for your PhD research isn’t just about the stipend—it shapes your entire academic experience. Funding affects your ability to explore ideas, attend conferences, and access resources for research. When evaluating advisors, consider the full financial picture. The right support can help you thrive, while a lack of it can create unnecessary hurdles. Your future research and peace of mind deserve a solid financial foundation.

Collecting References: How to Ensure Your Advisor Isn’t a Psychopath?

Choosing a PhD advisor involves collecting references, a crucial step for your experience. While an advisor’s research profile or reputation is important, real insights come from those who’ve worked with them. Talking to current and former students, visiting the lab, and using your network are effective ways to gather honest feedback. Here’s how to collect references to ensure you make the right choice.

1. Connect with the Advisor’s Students

While reaching out directly to potential advisors might seem like the natural first step, keep in mind that they likely receive hundreds of emails during application season. A direct reply might not be forthcoming, and even if it is, it’s hard to get a genuine sense of what it would be like to work with them. Instead, start by talking to their current students. Getting the perspective of someone already working in the lab can give you invaluable insight into the advisor’s working style. Find out how they manage things like lab finances, the atmosphere in the lab, and, most importantly, their relationship with students. These firsthand accounts will be more revealing than any formal interaction with the advisor could ever be.

2. Set Up a Short Chat and Visit the Lab

Once you’ve connected with students, set up a brief chat—around 30 minutes—to get a feel for the advisor’s working environment. If possible, plan a visit to the lab. Some institutions will sponsor your trip, or you could fund it yourself. This visit gives you the chance to meet the advisor in person and observe how they work. You’ll also get to assess whether you’ll be able to build a strong working relationship with them and fit in with the lab’s culture.

3. Tap into the Student Network

Another useful approach is to ask specific questions to potential PhD students who have already been through similar courses or worked in the same lab. If you’re at the same institution, this might even be a casual conversation during office hours. However, be prepared to ask clear, objective questions. Many students may not feel comfortable openly criticizing their advisor, but specific questions can help you uncover useful information. Ask about meeting frequency, advisor influence on projects, resources available in the lab, and the balance between academic and personal life. Here is a list of questions you could ask :

• What is the work-life balance like?
• Are there after-hours or weekend meetings?
• How supportive is the advisor in terms of personal and academic growth?
• What is the general atmosphere and culture in the lab?
• How does the advisor interact with their students—are they approachable and receptive to feedback?
• How does the advisor handle lab finances and resources?
• Have students from the lab gone on to successful academic or industry roles?
• How often do you meet with your advisor?
• How much influence does the advisor have on your projects?
• Are there any industry collaborations or external partnerships?
• What resources are available in the lab?

4. Look at Alumni Success

Make sure to also look into former students. Many advisors proudly list their graduates’ accomplishments on their websites, which can be a good sign of how much they value student success. If past students have gone on to do well in academia or industry, it suggests the advisor provides quality mentorship, even if it doesn’t directly reflect their personality.

5. Take Advantage of Conferences and Social Events

Conferences are another excellent opportunity to interact with both advisors and their students. Many conferences offer student volunteer positions that allow you to meet people and ask questions about what it’s like to work with a particular advisor. Additionally, attending social events or off-conference gatherings can provide informal settings where students are more likely to open up and share their experiences.

6. Test the Waters with Internships and Short-Term Projects

Finally, if you can, try working with the advisor on a temporary basis, such as through an internship, an honors project, or a short-term collaboration. This gives you the chance to experience the working relationship firsthand before making a longer-term commitment. If things go well, you may even be invited to participate in group meetings or continue working on research projects.

By following these strategies, you’ll have a much better chance of finding an advisor who aligns with your goals and working style—setting you up for success throughout your PhD journey.

Choosing the Right Research Topic for Your PhD

Starting a PhD is an exciting journey, and selecting the right research topic is one of the most important decisions you’ll make. The research topic you choose will be something you’ll dedicate several years of your life to, so it’s crucial to select one that aligns with both your interests and long-term academic goals.

Why Passion Matters in Your PhD Research Topic

Your research topic should reflect your passions and interests. As a PhD student, you’ll spend countless hours working on your research, so it’s essential to choose an area that motivates and excites you. Finding a topic you’re passionate about not only makes your research journey enjoyable but also fuels your drive to push boundaries and make meaningful contributions to your field.

Collaborating with the Right PhD Advisor

An ideal research topic is one where you and your advisor share a common interest. A strong advisor-student relationship is built on mutual passion for the subject matter, creating the perfect environment for a productive and collaborative research experience. An advisor with expertise in the field can provide invaluable guidance and mentorship, allowing you to grow both personally and academically.

Flexibility in Research and Advisor Selection

It’s perfectly normal to not know exactly which research path you want to take when you start your PhD. Many students shift their focus during their studies as they discover new areas of interest. In such cases, it’s important to choose an advisor who is open-minded and willing to support changes in direction.

To assess whether an advisor is flexible enough to support a change in direction, review their publication history. An advisor with a broad range of expertise can be a good fit, especially if you’re still uncertain about your research focus. Having a supportive advisor allows you the freedom to explore adjacent fields and pivot your research topic without feeling restricted.

Evolving Your Research Topic Throughout Your PhD

The right research topic, paired with a flexible advisor, creates the foundation for a fulfilling PhD experience. As your research interests evolve, having an advisor who can guide you through these changes is invaluable. This collaboration ensures that you’re not only working on something you love but also receiving the mentorship necessary to succeed, even as your research takes new and exciting directions.

Defining Success in a PhD and What Makes an Advisor Truly Supportive

In a PhD, success isn’t solely defined by the number of papers you publish; it extends to your overall growth as a researcher and individual. A truly supportive advisor is someone who prioritizes your success, viewing it as an extension of their own. This type of advisor goes beyond just offering academic guidance—they help shape your career and personal development.

A key sign of a great advisor is their active involvement in important milestones like fellowship applications. Rather than leaving you to navigate these alone, they offer feedback, ensuring that you present your best work. This support is invaluable, as fellowships not only provide financial backing but also enhance your CV. Likewise, a supportive advisor helps you refine your presentation skills, knowing that strong communication is essential for professional success.

Support also extends to your future career, whether in academia or industry. A great advisor will encourage internships for networking and real-world experience. They may also help you plan your career path and offer insights on tailoring your focus for academia or industry roles.

In addition to these practical supports, a true mentor invests in your growth on a personal level. They take the time to guide you through challenges, from refining your proposals to preparing for future opportunities. This kind of mentorship creates lasting relationships that extend well beyond your PhD, providing valuable connections and advice for years to come.

Ultimately, an advisor who treats your success as their own will support you through every aspect of your academic and professional journey, ensuring that you have the tools, connections, and guidance to thrive.

How to Find and Impress an Advisor

Finding the right advisor can significantly impact your academic and research career. Here are some strategies to help you impress potential advisors, especially when you’re just starting out and may not have an established network:

1. Leverage Personal Connections

If you don’t have direct connections with a potential advisor, try reaching out to someone who does. If you know a current or past student of the advisor, ask for an introduction. Personal connections can help ensure your email stands out. As researchers often receive hundreds of emails from unknown individuals, a warm introduction can boost your chances of getting noticed.

2. Craft a Thoughtful Email

When sending cold emails, ensure that you are well-prepared. Start by researching your potential advisor’s recent work. This demonstrates that you’ve taken the time to understand their research and are genuinely interested in their work. Personalize the email by mentioning specifics about their recent publications or projects that resonate with your interests. Keep your message concise, clear, and professional—avoid lengthy personal histories or unnecessary details. Also, show how your research aligns with theirs and why you would be a good fit for their lab.

Using tools like ChatGPT can help you phrase your email well, even if you’re unsure about your writing. A well-written, succinct message is more likely to receive a response.

3. Passion for Research

Advisors want to know that you are passionate about research. In your communication, make sure to clearly express your interest in pursuing research long-term. If you’re applying for a PhD, be sure that you convey how the research aligns with your long-term goals and how you’re prepared to dedicate the next several years to it.

One way to demonstrate this is by having a personal website or portfolio. It doesn’t need to be complex, but having a space to showcase your skills, projects, and research—like implementing papers—shows that you’re interested in both theory and practical application. It’s an easy way to prove you’re actively engaged in research beyond your coursework.

4. Build an Impressive Online Portfolio

A personal website can help you stand out. Many successful researchers have websites that showcase their work, publications, and projects. You could also include a GitHub page if you’re in a technical field and want to showcase code or demos. When an advisor sees that you’ve put in the effort to create a clean, professional website, it shows that you are dedicated, organized, and capable of handling research tasks.

The website doesn’t need to be intricate, but it should clearly display your achievements and technical skills. Even something as simple as a project page can make a big difference when a potential advisor is sifting through dozens of emails.

Finding the right advisor is a critical step in your academic journey. By using personal connections, writing a thoughtful and personalized email, demonstrating your passion for research, and building an online portfolio, you can increase your chances of making a strong impression. But just as important is recognizing red flags that could indicate a poor fit. Choose a advisor who will provide the mentorship and support you need to succeed in your research career.

The Ultimate Checklist: How to Vet Your Potential PhD Advisor

Choosing the right advisor is one of the most important decisions you’ll make during your academic career. It can shape your entire PhD experience, including the type of research you do, the opportunities you’ll have, and the level of support you’ll receive. Here’s a practical, itemized checklist to help you make an informed decision when selecting a potential PhD advisor.

1. Talk to Current and Past Students
   One of the most valuable resources for understanding what it’s like to work with a particular advisor is the students who are currently in their lab, as well as those who have graduated. Ask about their experiences, the supervision style, the level of support they received, and any challenges they faced. If you can, get feedback from students who have both succeeded and faced difficulties under that advisor’s guidance. Their insights will give you a well-rounded view of the advisory relationship.
2. Assess the Advisor’s Advising Style
   Every advisor has a different approach to mentoring. Some may be very hands-on, while others might give you more independence. Understanding the style that suits you best is key to a successful relationship. Ask about the advisor’s communication practices, how often they meet with their students, and how they provide feedback. A good match in advising style can make a world of difference in your productivity and overall experience.
3. Consider the Lab Culture
   The work environment plays a crucial role in your PhD journey. Take the time to learn about the lab culture—how students collaborate, the overall atmosphere, and the level of competition. A healthy and supportive environment will help foster your growth and ensure that you can thrive during your studies. Don’t hesitate to ask students about the dynamics and how the advisor encourages collaboration versus individual work.
4. Evaluate Research Alignment
   It’s important that your research interests align with your potential advisor’s work. A advisor’s passion for the field will greatly influence the quality of your experience. Look at their recent papers, ongoing research projects, and the lab’s general focus. Your interests should complement theirs, ensuring that you’ll be excited and engaged in your research for the long haul.
5. Check for Professional and Academic Support
   Advisors should provide not only academic guidance but also career development support. Find out if the advisor offers opportunities for networking, internships, collaborations with other institutions, and attendance at conferences. An advisor who actively helps students develop their careers is a huge asset to your future.
6. Consider Their Availability and Commitment
   An advisor’s availability is crucial, especially when you encounter obstacles in your research. Ask about how often they’re available for one-on-one meetings and how responsive they are to emails. Additionally, ensure that the advisor has the time and resources to invest in your development. If they’re too overloaded with their own commitments, they may not be able to provide the level of attention you need.
7. Review the Advisor’s Track Record of Successful Students
   Past students’ success stories can provide a lot of information about what you can expect. Look at the advisor’s track record of graduating students, their post-PhD career paths, and the types of projects they’ve worked on. An advisor with a history of helping students succeed is likely to be a great choice.
8. Understand Their Approach to Work-Life Balance
   A good advisor will respect your work-life balance and encourage a healthy approach to research. Ensure that the advisor fosters an environment where mental health is a priority and where students can pursue personal goals alongside their academic work. Burnout is a real issue in academia, and it’s important to find an advisor who supports your well-being.

Key Points in the Ultimate Checklist for Choosing a PhD Advisor:

• Talk to current and past students about their experiences.
• Assess the advisor’s advising style (hands-on or independent?).
• Consider the lab culture (collaborative vs. competitive).
• Evaluate the research alignment between your interests and the advisor’s.
• Check for career support and networking opportunities.
• Ensure the advisor has adequate availability and commitment.
• Review the track record of successful students and their career paths.
• Understand the advisor’s approach to work-life balance.

By following this checklist, you’ll be better equipped to choose an advisor who aligns with your goals and can help you navigate the complexities of your PhD journey.

Red Flags to Watch Out for When Choosing a PhD Advisor

While finding the right PhD advisor is crucial, some signs should raise concerns. If you encounter any of the following red flags during your search, it may be worth reconsidering your choice.

1. Negative Comments from Current or Past Students
   If you hear repeated negative feedback about an advisor from their current or former students, take it seriously. While one bad review might be an anomaly, consistent negative comments can indicate serious issues with the advisor’s approach.
2. Inconsistent or No Response to Emails
   Communication is key in any academic relationship. If the advisor frequently ignores emails or is slow to respond (without valid reasons), this can signal a lack of respect for your time and needs.
3. Failure to Show Up for Meetings
   If the advisor frequently cancels meetings without notice or doesn’t show up at all, this is a red flag. A good advisor respects your time and should be professional enough to inform you if they need to reschedule.
4. No Online Presence
   In today’s digital age, an advisor should have an online presence. Lack of a Google Scholar profile, personal website, or outdated online information can signal that the advisor is disengaged from their research or the academic community.
5. No Research Funding
   A lack of funding or grants to support research can make it difficult for you to complete your PhD. If the advisor cannot secure financial support for their projects, it could lead to you having to fund your own research, which is not ideal.
6. Declining Research Impact
   Pay attention to the advisor’s research impact, which can be reflected in the trend of their Google Scholar citations. If there is a noticeable decline in their academic output or research influence, it may suggest that their research is stagnating.
7. Lack of Collaborations
   If an advisor has not collaborated with other researchers or institutions in recent years, this could indicate a lack of networking and opportunities. Collaborations, both academic and industry-related, are key for your career growth and future prospects.

Key Red Flags to Watch for:

• Negative comments from current or past students about the advisor.
• Inconsistent or no response to emails.
• Failure to show up for meetings or canceling without notice.
• Lack of an online presence (Google Scholar, personal website, etc.).
• No research funding or grants.
• Declining research impact (e.g., citations).
• Lack of recent academic or industry collaborations.

By keeping an eye out for these red flags, you can avoid potentially problematic advisors and find someone who will genuinely support your academic and professional development.

Our Personal Academic Journey

To provide the right context for the content we shared, it’s important to reflect on our own academic backgrounds. These experiences have shaped our perspectives on choosing the right PhD advisor, and understanding where we come from can offer valuable insights into the choices we made along the way. As we discuss the significance of selecting an advisor, it’s crucial to recognize how our unique academic journeys, challenges, and mentors influenced these decisions. Remember, your milage may vary.

Derek Liu’s Academic Journey: A Global Path to Academia:

Derek Liu, currently a research scientist at Roblox, has had a fascinating academic trajectory spanning multiple continents. He began his education in Taiwan, where he completed his undergraduate studies. From there, he pursued a master’s degree at Carnegie Mellon University in the United States before moving to the University of Toronto in Canada for his PhD.

Throughout his journey, Derek was fortunate to have outstanding advisors and mentors who shaped his academic and professional growth. His experiences with supportive advisors and enriching internships have given him a clear perspective on what makes a great PhD advisor. In this episode (and blog post), he shared these insights to help prospective PhD students make informed decisions about their own mentors.

My Journey: From Israel to Australia

My own academic path has been quite different but equally enlightening. Born and raised in Israel, I completed my bachelor’s, master’s, and PhD at the Technion. Following that, I moved to Australia for a postdoctoral position. Until recently, I was a research fellow at the Technion and ANU. This episode was recorded shortly before I joined Roblox as a research scientist as well.

Like Derek, I was fortunate to have incredibly supportive advisors who not only guided my research but also became lifelong mentors and friends. However, reflecting on my own journey, I now realize how little I knew when I started my PhD. At the time, I didn’t fully grasp the significance of choosing the right advisor. My main focus was simply getting accepted into a program, without understanding the long-term impact an advisor would have on my academic experience and career trajectory.

The motivation for this episode came from seeing friends and colleagues suffer under challenging or unsupportive supervisors. Their struggles made me realize how crucial it is to choose an advisor carefully. This is something I didn’t fully appreciate when I started my PhD.

Closing Remarks

Choosing the right advisor is one of the most important decisions in your academic journey. It will shape not only your research but also your personal and professional development. However, this decision doesn’t just apply to academia — the principles of finding the right mentor or supervisor apply across many fields, from industry to government to non-profits. It’s crucial to remain open-minded and aware that different cultures, countries, and contexts will shape the experience differently.

In this episode, we’ve shared our knowledge and insights, but of course, everyone’s experience is unique. We invite the community to share their thoughts and questions, and if there’s something we haven’t covered yet, feel free to let us know. We are happy to continue the conversation and help in any way we can.

If you’d like to reach out, you can leave comments on the various platforms, or you can email us directly — we love hearing from our listeners and helping where we can.

Thanks for joining us on this episode of Talking Papers, and remember: whether you’re just starting your journey or are in the midst of it, take the time to choose wisely. And as always, let your papers do the talking.

This episode was recorded in April 2024

CONTACT

If you would like to be a guest, sponsor or share your thoughts, feel free to reach out via email: talking.papers.podcast@gmail.com

SUBSCRIBE AND FOLLOW

🎧Subscribe on your favourite podcast app

📧Subscribe to our mailing list

🐦Follow us on Twitter

🎥Subscribe to our YouTube channel